Brands building category leadership
Where being the named expert in the AI engine answer is a strategic priority.
See exactly where your brand appears - or doesn't - across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google AI Overviews.
Start your audit →Third-party mentions in publications AI engines trust.
Digital PR for AI Citations is a specialised PR programme designed to earn editorial coverage in publications and platforms that LLM training corpora draw heavily from. It combines classical PR craft (story development, journalist relationships, embargo discipline) with AI-engine analysis (which sources do specific engines cite most often in our category). Clickate runs this for Nigerian and international brands building durable answer-engine authority.
Brands invest in schema, content rewriting and llms.txt - all important and easy to measure. They under-invest in the harder, slower work of earning credible editorial coverage. That under-investment is a mistake, because the citation graphs inside major LLMs weight third-party authoritative coverage heavily. A single feature in Bloomberg or BusinessDay can do more for your AI citation rate than fifty pages of internal content. The asymmetry argues for serious investment in PR, not just optimisation work that lives entirely on your own domain.
Wikipedia is the single most important source LLMs draw on. A brand or founder with a clean Wikipedia entry has a structural advantage in AI visibility that competitors without one cannot quickly close. But Wikipedia is also unforgiving - entries get challenged by editors looking for notability problems, conflict-of-interest concerns, or sourcing weaknesses. We assess whether you qualify for a Wikipedia entry honestly. If the answer is no - yet - we tell you so and propose the publicity work that builds the notability foundation. If yes, we engage the right experienced Wikipedia editors to handle creation and maintenance properly.
Start with a citation-source analysis so we know exactly which placements would move the needle.
Different LLMs weight different sources differently. ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity have observable citation preferences. We pursue placements weighted to the engines that matter most for your buyer base.
Wikipedia is one of the highest-weighted sources for every major LLM. A clean, well-maintained Wikipedia entry is one of the highest-leverage AI visibility interventions available.
Some clients are not yet ready for Wikipedia or tier-one PR — their underlying notability does not yet justify it. We say so honestly and work on building the substance first.
A two-thousand-word feature in BusinessDay outperforms ten short mentions in lower-tier publications for AI citation purposes.
Where being the named expert in the AI engine answer is a strategic priority.
Where editorial coverage influences investor perception, analyst consensus and ultimately valuation.
Where the editorial trail in the AI engines and Google becomes part of due diligence.
Within two quarters most programmes show a meaningful lift in how often LLMs cite your brand in category-relevant answers.
Each placement is a permanent link from a trusted domain — useful for AI citations and classical SEO simultaneously.
Brands often have Wikipedia entries that get edited away by hostile editors. Our maintenance keeps the entry stable.
See exactly where your brand appears - or doesn't - across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google AI Overviews.
Read more →Citation-ready content, entity building and the digital PR that AI engines trust.
Read more →