B2B brands with considered purchase cycles
Where buyers research deeply via AI engines before talking to sales and being named matters more than being ranked.
See exactly where your brand appears - or doesn't - across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google AI Overviews.
Start your audit →Citation-ready content, entity building and the digital PR that AI engines trust.
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) covers the structural, content and citation work that makes large language models likely to mention your brand correctly. It includes structured data (schema), llms.txt and AI-crawlability files, answer-engine-optimised content (clear, factual, quotable), citation acquisition in publications the engines trust, and ongoing monitoring of model outputs. GEO is run as a monthly retainer rather than a one-off because the engines retrain and the competitive landscape shifts continuously.
For two decades SEO meant winning ranked positions on a search results page so that humans clicked through. Generative engines change the geometry - they synthesise an answer, name a few brands, and the user often never clicks through to any source. The number of impressions a brand receives can be high; the number of pixels a buyer ever sees from that brand's own website can be zero. The currency has shifted from ranking to mention.
This changes optimisation. Ranking optimisation pursues keywords. Mention optimisation pursues recommendability - the qualities that make an LLM choose your brand over competitors when composing an answer. Recommendability includes factual confidence (the engine has clean information about you), positive associations (sentiment in the corpus is favourable), distinctive expertise (you are known for something specific) and citation-worthiness (publications the engine trusts reference you frequently).
The work has more overlap than competition. Schema, technical health, content quality and authoritative citations help both classical ranking and AI mention rates. Where the disciplines diverge is in tactic emphasis - GEO leans harder on knowledge-graph hygiene, answer-block formatting and citation acquisition in LLM-preferred sources. SEO leans harder on keyword targeting and internal linking. We run them as one integrated programme for clients who want both, with shared infrastructure and differentiated tactics inside.
Six-month minimum because the work compounds. Start with an audit, then move into ongoing optimisation.
LLMs trained on the broad web develop preferences for certain sources within each topic. Becoming a source — original data, expert commentary, clear taxonomies, citable phrases — is the durable strategy. Tactics evolve; being the source remains.
Schema markup tells engines what your content is about; content quality tells them whether to repeat it. Both matter. Most Nigerian brands have neither set up properly.
Wikipedia, Wikidata, Crunchbase and LinkedIn entries feed the LLM training corpus. Inconsistencies between them confuse engines. We keep them aligned and current.
Classic SEO measures position; GEO measures whether you were named. The KPIs are different — and the optimisation targets are different too.
Where buyers research deeply via AI engines before talking to sales and being named matters more than being ranked.
Where "best Nigerian X" queries shape consideration sets.
Where factual accuracy of AI engine answers carries reputational and sometimes legal weight.
Brands that commit to GEO for nine to fifteen months consistently see their answer-engine mention rate move from under twenty percent to above sixty in relevant prompts.
When engines have clean, well-structured information about you to reference, they invent less. Hallucination rates drop measurably as the work progresses.
Your leadership has a coherent story about why AI search matters and what your brand is doing about it — useful for board reviews, investor decks and internal alignment.
See exactly where your brand appears - or doesn't - across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google AI Overviews.
Read more →